Cabanes and Plywood Types
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 11:20 pm
I have two pretty much unrelated topics. I have researched both in the archive and have found in one case the question has been asked before but could not find it answered. In the other case there has been much discussion and answered various ways.
1. What is the purpose of the threaded fork in the aft strut of the cabanes. It is also used in the interplane struts, why. It cannot really be adjusted in or out without twisting the spars, since the other attach points are not "hinges" - Unless you use the universal type joint that has been mentioned, with its concerns of not adequately supporting the spars, since it can hinge. It must really be set to one position, the position in which the cabanes or interplanes will assemble, and then left alone. Furthermore, since it has no opposite left threaded counterpart it is not really a "turnbuckle" so is limited to turning it at least 1/2 turn at a time to get the bolt in again, so its adjustments are somewhat coarse.
2. What plywood (birch or mahog) is used in the centersection floor and the spar doubler plates. It seems both have been the answer depending on the thread you read. My thoughts would be that birch is denser, stronger/stiffer but heavier and its tight grain does not make as good of glue joints. Mahog is all the reverse of that. On the spar doublers strength is good, but so is a good glue joint to the spars, since if the glue fails it hardly matters if the bolts can tear through the plywood - So maybe Mahog to be sure they do not separate from the spars???
On the center section floor it is mostly loaded in compression and maybe some torsional loads. It will be there soaking up compression loads whether it remains glued to the spars and ribs or not, so maybe birch is better. On the other hand, that is a big piece of plywood and the weight of birch over mahog is probably significant if mahog is adequate.
Comments/Opinions? Has anyone seen the answer actually called out in the plans that I'm missing? Is anyone out there flying either of the above configurations and still alive to write about it?
1. What is the purpose of the threaded fork in the aft strut of the cabanes. It is also used in the interplane struts, why. It cannot really be adjusted in or out without twisting the spars, since the other attach points are not "hinges" - Unless you use the universal type joint that has been mentioned, with its concerns of not adequately supporting the spars, since it can hinge. It must really be set to one position, the position in which the cabanes or interplanes will assemble, and then left alone. Furthermore, since it has no opposite left threaded counterpart it is not really a "turnbuckle" so is limited to turning it at least 1/2 turn at a time to get the bolt in again, so its adjustments are somewhat coarse.
2. What plywood (birch or mahog) is used in the centersection floor and the spar doubler plates. It seems both have been the answer depending on the thread you read. My thoughts would be that birch is denser, stronger/stiffer but heavier and its tight grain does not make as good of glue joints. Mahog is all the reverse of that. On the spar doublers strength is good, but so is a good glue joint to the spars, since if the glue fails it hardly matters if the bolts can tear through the plywood - So maybe Mahog to be sure they do not separate from the spars???
On the center section floor it is mostly loaded in compression and maybe some torsional loads. It will be there soaking up compression loads whether it remains glued to the spars and ribs or not, so maybe birch is better. On the other hand, that is a big piece of plywood and the weight of birch over mahog is probably significant if mahog is adequate.
Comments/Opinions? Has anyone seen the answer actually called out in the plans that I'm missing? Is anyone out there flying either of the above configurations and still alive to write about it?