Page 9 of 9
Re: Cabane Fork terminals
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:40 pm
by orchardair
I just pinged Carl as well.
Re: Cabane Fork terminals
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 11:03 am
by RSouthard
Carl emailed me back yesterday and said he was very sorry for the delay and that he was having his son devote 100% to completing our orders. He also said that he has two orders ready to go if anyone is in need of having them ASAP.
I assured him that we appreciate his work and that no apology was needed. That said, we should have them within the next couple weeks.
Re: Cabane Fork terminals
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 12:47 pm
by orchardair
Yesterday I got the six forks in the mail. They are beautiful.
Re: Cabane Fork terminals
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:57 pm
by dougm
Me too. They're gorgeous!
Re: Cabane Fork terminals
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 2:04 pm
by freerangequark
Hi,
I'm searching for a similar part for my Marquart Charger.
In regard to the McMaster part number 4749T111. This part of AISI 1045 Medium Carbon Steel with a hardness of Rockwell 88 B. The threads are rolled.
Based off the 3D CAD model, the yoke opening depth as measured from the centerline of the hole is .55"
-Glenn Gordon
NX6781G
Re: Cabane Fork terminals
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 2:08 pm
by Bitshifter
McMaster Carr forks for those concerned.
Fork.jpg
Re: Cabane Fork terminals
Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:19 pm
by dougm
I considered these but passed on them for a few reasons where they don't match the plans:
Plans
Material: 321 Stainless
Threaded shaft length: 1.5 in
Groove Depth: 15/16 in
McMaster (QA1) forks
Material: Carbon Steel
Threaded shaft length: 1.25 inch
Groove Depth: Not clear, some images look deeper?
The packaging indicates they are made by QA1 Precision Products (
http://www.qa1.net/rod-ends-and-related ... s/clevises ). The QA1 site also mentions Chrome plating. If they are plated then they need to have spent some time in an oven to address hydrogen embrittlement. These are structural components and their site doesn't specify whether or not they meet aircraft standards.
I'm not saying they won't work, just saying there wasn't enough info (in addition to the differences) for me to feel they would serve as a comparable replacement.
Re: Cabane Fork terminals
Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2016 3:12 pm
by HC85
I plan on using the ones from McMaster. Mr. Shoemake told me they will be just fine, and the ones I have are not chrome plated. If the .250 is a problem, I will make my struts a little longer.
Re: Cabane Fork terminals
Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2016 5:40 pm
by dougm
Good to hear you talked Jeff. There are not many options for these so this is good to know.